This time, we will look back on the Tokyo Olympics and Paralympics that ended successfully. Representative Eiji Murakami (Hiroshima Prefectural Assembly member) gives honest impressions on the good points and bad points. The good point is the medal rush of Japanese players. Regarding the strengthening budget for each competition, the Olympic Organizing Committee has set a rule within 10 times the subsidy, so I feel that it was great to eliminate the inequity between low-budget golf competitions and high-budget swimming competitions, for example. The bad point is the production of the opening and closing ceremony, which was controversial. Since open recruitment has become the mainstream in Japan, it was impressive that there were no quirks or sharp points in the production. It seems that this flow of open recruitment will continue in the future, but in this case, the events sponsored by the government will always be in the open recruitment style, and it seems that the production will be honestly boring. ■ Past video Where is the cost burden for IOC Bach’s visit to Hiroshima? Detailed explanations such as the security burden of the Peace Memorial Park used by guests from overseas! https://youtu.be/76DTXWhtFbg Japanese athletes’ medal rush at the Tokyo Olympics! As a result of narrowing the disparity in strengthening costs by competition, Japanese players were able to play an active role in various events! https://youtu.be/nbtl7Zrs_l8 How do you evaluate corona infection during the Tokyo Olympics? Low positive rate of related parties and spread of infection among Tokyo residents. https://youtu.be/NmhMO-81Gns

JP2021.COM