[Kamata Daichi]Why was the Crystal Palace Electro qualifying for the EL? The dark side of UEFA is furious when the club president calls for “the biggest fraud in history”! The shocking truth about the allegations of a behind-the-scenes deal with Nottingham Forest and the court of arbitration of sports

In contrast to the historical achievement, why did Kamata Daichi’s Crystal Palace have to be stripped of his Europa League (EL), which he was supposed to have won? Behind the inexplicable ruling, which the club president declares, “one of the greatest injustice that has occurred in European football,” hidden deep-rooted issues that cannot be simply misfortuned under the rules. Is this really “it can’t be helped because it’s a rule”? This video thoroughly explores the full picture of Crystal Palace’s ELECTRIC qualifying for the ECL, a lower league. -What is the “same owner problem” that is the core of the problem? -Why does the Palace claim that the owner is different? – The reality of surprising inequality and information disparity hidden in the deadline “until March 1st” – The shocking reason why rival club Nottingham Forest is being criticized – The past similar cases (Red Bull, Brighton, etc.) could have been avoided, so why is Palace the only one…? The Palace has been prepared to file a petition with the Court of Arbitration of Sports (CAS), claiming that information has been leaked in favour of a particular club. Will this claim be accepted? Or will the decision of the huge organization UEFA not be overturned? We’ll get to the bottom of the big question that questions the transparency of European soccer, which no soccer fan can overlook. Please check the main video for all the endings. #Kamada Daichi #Crystal Palace #European League #UEFA #Critical Questions #Soccer #Premier League #Nottingham Forest #FA Cup #Same Owner Issue